Blog

Keep up to date with the latest news

技嘉 Aero X16 评测:配备 Nvidia RTX 5070 笔记本电脑和可升级内存的时尚 AMD Zen 5 游戏机

结论:Aero X16 整体性能出色,但 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑令人失望技嘉推出的 Aero X16 是市场上首批配备全新 RTX 5070 的游戏笔记本电脑之一。它与 AMD Ryzen 处理器一起构成了一个高效的软件包,许多游戏也能在 QHD 分辨率下流畅运行。

但问题是,与上一代 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU 相比,其速度优势非常小,而且不变的 8 GB 显存在运行要求较高的游戏时变得越来越成问题。当然,技嘉对此也无可指责,因为所有即将推出的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑都会遇到这个问题。

165 Hz 刷新率的雾面 IPS 显示屏无法与 OLED 的亮度相提并论,但主观上整体画质还是不错的,实测值也相当不错。该显示屏也适合在 sRGB 色彩空间中进行图像编辑,不会出现任何问题。

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

塑料机身给人的整体印象不错,尤其是键盘非常舒适。不过,由于不支持 PCIe Gen5 和 Wi-Fi 7,一些设备被削减了。对于大多数用户来说,这当然是合格的,但如何在一台售价高达 1800 欧元的笔记本电脑上安装一个蹩脚的 USB 2.0 端口,这对我们来说是个谜。

正面两个区域的连接分布也不是很理想。另一方面,可扩展内存和两个固态硬盘插槽的升级选项非常不错。

尽管如此,RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的性能依然令人失望。购买配备旧版 RTX 4070 GPU 的笔记本电脑更有意义,因为你可以用更低的价格获得几乎相同的游戏性能。

Pros+ 坚固的外壳

+ 高度舒适的键盘

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 游戏性能基本满足 QHD 标准

+ 无 PWM 的 165 Hz 雾面 IPS 显示屏

+ 可扩展内存(最大 64 GB)和 2 个固态硬盘插槽(M.2-2280)Cons- 游戏性能勉强优于 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

- 非理想的端口分布和 1x USB 2.0

- 游戏时风扇噪音大

- 无 Wi-Fi 7

- 弱 1080p 网络摄像头

价格和供应情况目前,只有价格较高的 Aero X16 版本在亚马逊和Notebooksbilliger 有售,售价为 1,999 欧元。

$1,599.99GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ PC - 165Hz 2560x1600 WQXGA - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370-1TB SSD with 32GB DDR5 RAM - Windows 11 Home - Lunar White AERO X16 2WHA3USC64DH$1,149.99GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ PC - 165Hz 2560x1600 WQXGA - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 - AMD Ryzen AI 7 350-1TB SSD with 16GB DDR5 RAM - Windows 11 Home - Space Gray AERO X16 1TH93USC94AHPuccy 3 Pack Screen Protector, compatible with GIGABYTE AERO X16 1WH 16" Laptop TPU Film Guard ( Not Tempered Glass Protectors)

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

Table of Contents结论:Aero X16 整体性能出色,但 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑令人失望规格外壳和功能坚固耐用、不易沾染指纹的塑料外壳输入设备舒适的键盘显示屏哑光 165 Hz IPS,无 PWM性能AMD Zen 5,可扩展内存排放与能源:无压力时可承受的热量和噪音输出Notebookcheck 总体评分Potential competitors in comparison

技嘉推出的 Aero X16 是一款轻薄的 16 英寸游戏/多媒体笔记本电脑,结合了最新的 AMD Ryzen AI 移动处理器和全新的 Nvidia RTX 5070 处理器。 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑最大 TGP 为 85 W。

我们测试的是入门级版本的 Aero X16,配备了 Ryzen AI 7 350RTX 5070 笔记本电脑、32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 165 Hz 刷新率的哑光 IPS 显示屏(2,560x1,600)。

该配置的零售价为 1799 欧元。还有一款配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370和 2 TB SSD 的型号,售价为 1,999 欧元。

规格

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH (Aero X16 Series)ProcessorAMD Ryzen AI 7 350 8 x 2 - 5 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Krackan Point (Zen 5)Graphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2595 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 85 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), 572.96, Optimus, MUX-SwitchMemory32 GB , DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GBDisplay16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, MNG007DA5-1, IPS, glossy: no, 165 HzMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHStorageKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, 1024 GB , 780 GB freeSoundcardAMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio ControllerConnections1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm AudioNetworkingRealtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 355 x 251Battery76 Wh, 4790 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 1080p + IRPrimary Camera: 2 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: Stereo (2x 2 Watt), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 150W PSU, 24 Months WarrantyWeight1.968 kg, Power Supply: 455 g

Price1799 EuroLinksGigabyte homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

外壳和功能坚固耐用、不易沾染指纹的塑料外壳技嘉为新款 Aero X16 采用了塑料结构。对于 16 英寸设备来说,机身相当紧凑,高度为 16.7-19.9 毫米,重量为 1.97 千克。除了极易沾染指纹的深灰色版本外,还有白色版本可供选择。整体而言,稳定性和做工都非常出色。

两个铰链足够坚固(最大开启角度 135°),只允许极小的摇晃。由于 Aero X16 是首批将 Zen 5 处理器与可扩展内存相结合的设备之一,因此升级选项非常不错。此外,还有两个用于固态硬盘的 M.2-2280 插槽。

不过,你需要面对一些功能上的妥协。首先,只有一个 Wi-Fi 6E 模块和一个速度较慢的 USB 2.0 端口,这对于 2025 年的高端笔记本电脑来说是无法解释的。

这些端口位于非常靠近正面的两侧。得益于 AMD 处理器,技嘉 Aero X16 是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,具有先进的 AI 功能,包括实时字幕和网络摄像头的演播室特效。

网络摄像头可拍摄 1080p 格式的照片,但画质不是特别好。提供用于人脸识别的红外模块。

尺寸比较

Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23) Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV Dell XPS 16 9640 Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M DIN A4 ❌

左:电源输入、千兆以太网、HDMI 2.1、USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A(5 Gbit/s)、USB4 Type-C(40 GBit/s)、DisplayPort 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0

右:3.5 毫米音频插孔、USB 2.0 Type-A、USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A (5 GBit/s)

后部无连接

NetworkingGigabyte Aero X16 1WHRealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1795 (min: 1676) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1719 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1516 (min: 1419) MBit/s ∼84%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1654 (min: 1596) MBit/s ∼96%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1804 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1700 (min: 1661) MBit/s ∼100%

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1650 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼92%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1654 (min: 1568) MBit/s ∼96%

Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1580 (min: 1483) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1591 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼93%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1654 (min: 1599) MBit/s ∼92%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1600 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼93%

Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1494 (min: 1257) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1583 (min: 1176) MBit/s ∼92%

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1795 (1676-1853) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1718 (1618-1747)

16.8 ∆E19 ∆E25.9 ∆E21.8 ∆E24.5 ∆E17.2 ∆E16.1 ∆E30.9 ∆E19.1 ∆E20.9 ∆E14.3 ∆E16.1 ∆E22.4 ∆E20.3 ∆E17.2 ∆E14.6 ∆E21.1 ∆E25.7 ∆E2.3 ∆E16.4 ∆E21.4 ∆E24.7 ∆E18.8 ∆E11.8 ∆EColorChecker Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH: 19.13 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 30.88 ∆E

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

可持续性技嘉没有提供任何有关环保标准、二氧化碳排放量或使用可回收材料的信息。包装几乎完全由纸板组成。

输入设备舒适的键盘Aero X16 没有数字键盘,但它的键盘非常舒适,键程长达 1.7 毫米,按压点精确。在布局方面,只有小方向键非常恼人。键盘采用 1 区 RGB 背光,有三个强度级别。

触摸板足够大(13.3 x 9 厘米),滑动性能非常好,但机械咔哒声有点响。

技嘉 Aero X16:键盘和触摸板

键盘照明显示屏哑光 165 Hz IPS,无 PWM子像素矩阵

边缘有明显的背光渗漏Aero X16 采用哑光 IPS 屏幕,分辨率为 2,560x1,600 和 165 Hz 刷新率。主观感觉画质不错,内容清晰,色彩丰富,即使是明亮的内容,仔细观察也只会出现轻微的颗粒感。

不过,IPS 面板无法赶上 OLED 面板或迷你 LED 面板。尽管如此,面板没有 PWM 闪烁,响应时间也很快。

我们测得的峰值亮度为 403 cd/m²,加上 0.32 cd/m² 略高的黑阶,测得的对比度仅为 1,234:1。

使用 Portrait Displays 提供的专业 Calman Ultimate 软件进行分析,已经显示出非常准确的工作前色彩,但偏蓝光极少,色温稍低。

我们可以通过自己的校准来纠正这一点,但最大亮度会下降约 25 cd/m²。sRGB 色彩空间已完全覆盖,因此 Aero X16 也适用于编辑图像和视频。

400cd/m²401cd/m²402cd/m²402cd/m²395cd/m²399cd/m²391cd/m²403cd/m²393cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessMNG007DA5-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 403 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 398.4 cd/m² Minimum: 19.5 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²Contrast: 1234:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}calibrated: 1.4ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}71.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)96.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6842 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHMNG007DA5-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 HzAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVB160UAN08.1 (AUO9BB0), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 HzLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 HzDell XPS 16 9640SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3", 90 HzAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzSchenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 HzDisplay-41%22%23%28%0% Display P3 Coverage (%)68.739.8 -42%97 41%98.3 43%99.9 45%68.3 -1% sRGB Coverage (%)96.159.7 -38%99.9 4%100 4%100 4%98.6 3% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)71.241.1 -42%86.6 22%87.8 23%96.9 36%69.6 -2%Response Times-32%-145%89%97%-14% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)12 ?(5.7, 6.3)13.6 ?(6.6, 7) -13%22.2 ?(9.6, 12.6) -85%0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39) 93%0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11) 98%13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1) -10% Response Time Black / White * (ms)5.6 ?(2.1, 3.5)8.4 ?(4.2, 4.2) -50%17 ?(8.2, 8.8) -204%0.85 ?(0.46, 0.39) 85%0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) 96%6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1) -18% PWM Frequency (Hz)4840 ?(100)360 ?(90)960 ?(60)Screen-147%22%-5%-7%-39%Brightness middle (cd/m²)395347 -12%651 65%366 -7%416 5%376 -5%Brightness (cd/m²)398321 -19%673 69%367 -8%418 5%358 -10%Brightness Distribution (%)9788 -9%93 -4%96 -1%96 -1%88 -9%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.320.3 6%0.22 31%0.33 -3%Contrast (:1)12341157 -6%2959 140%1139 -8%Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.35.89 -353%1.9 -46%1.3 -0%1.6 -23%2.74 -111%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.819.26 -588%4.2 -50%3.6 -29%2.1 25%6.78 -142%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.44.3 -207%0.6 57%1 29%0.88 37%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.84.27 -137%3 -67%2.2 -22%2.7 -50%3.57 -98%Gamma2.2 100%2.47 89%2.18 101%2.14 103%2.16 102%2.4 92%CCT6842 95%7158 91%6738 96%6680 97%6331 103%7246 90%Total Average (Program / Settings)-73% /

-108%-34% /

-2%36% /

18%39% /

22%-18% /

-27%* ... smaller is better

校准前的灰度

校准前的饱和扫描

校准前的色彩检查器

校准后的灰度

校准后的饱和扫描

校准后的 Colorchecker

对比 sRGB

对比显示屏 P3

对比 Adobe RGB

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.1 ms rise↘ 3.5 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise↘ 6.3 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

阳光下的户外活动

室外(明亮的白天,无阳光直射)

视角稳定性性能AMD Zen 5,可扩展内存

测试条件技嘉通过自己的 GiMATE 软件提供了各种能耗配置文件和广泛的设置选项。我们在性能(游戏)模式下进行了所有基准测试和测量。

处理器AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350(Krackan Point)配备 8 个 Zen 5 内核(4x Zen 5 + 4x Zen 5c),主要用于廉价笔记本电脑,性能不俗。可选的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370可选的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 肯定会从更高的 70 W 功率限制中获益更多。

在负载情况下,持续多核性能保持完全稳定。在电池模式(最大 45 瓦)下,多核性能仅下降 6%。

Cinebench R15 Multi-core loop

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2388 (2369.95-2431.91) Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3434 (3179.65-3495.89) Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2931 (2869.44-3004.58) Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2707 (2643.06-2817.5) Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17) Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)

CPU Performance rating: Percent Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance rating

Average of class Gaming

85.9 pt Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV -2! AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

81.6 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 -2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

74.7 pt Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

71.3 pt Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

70 pt Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23) -2! AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

68.3 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

68 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

67.1 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core

Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=101, last 2 years)

1415 Points +54%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1001 Points +9%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

917 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (720 - 1011, n=12)

898 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

799 Points -13%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core

Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=102, last 2 years)

120 Points +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

117.7 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (113.5 - 119, n=12)

115.8 Points -2%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

104 Points -12%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

103 Points -12%Cinebench R23 / Multi Core

Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years)

25070 Points +40%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

23575 Points +32%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

19851 Points +11%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

18433 Points +3%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

17865 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

17267 Points -3%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

17205 Points -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12647 - 17899, n=15)

15820 Points -11%Cinebench R23 / Single Core

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2036 Points +4%Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years)

1976 Points +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

1966 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1916 - 2006, n=15)

1959 Points 0%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1906 Points -3%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1791 Points -9%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1767 Points -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1681 Points -14%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)

Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=145, last 2 years)

9655 Points +43%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

9160 Points +36%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

7651 Points +14%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

7146 Points +6%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

6738 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

6682 Points -1%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

6656 Points -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (4897 - 6990, n=13)

6168 Points -8%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

798 Points +4%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

770 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (751 - 784, n=13)

768 Points 0%Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=145, last 2 years)

763 Points -1%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

735 Points -5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

693 Points -10%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

686 Points -11%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

672 Points -13%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit

Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=145, last 2 years)

3880 Points +60%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

3496 (3179.65min - 3495.89max) Points +44%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

3005 (2869.44min - 3004.58max) Points +24%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2818 (2643.06min - 2817.5max) Points +16%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2681 (2635.57min - 2681.14max) Points +10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points +10%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1932 - 2734, n=14)

2467 Points +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2432 (2369.95min - 2431.91max) Points Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

308 Points +51%Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=144, last 2 years)

292 Points +43%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

280 Points +37%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (204 - 305, n=14)

279 Points +37%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

270 Points +32%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

264 Points +29%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

260 Points +27%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

204 Points Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (182 - 386, n=14)

221 Seconds * -21%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

193 Seconds * -6%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

186 Seconds * -2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

182 Seconds * Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

179 Seconds * +2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

163 Seconds * +10%Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=141, last 2 years)

154.9 Seconds * +15%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

147 Seconds * +19%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4

Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=143, last 2 years)

90939 MIPS +53%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

80868 MIPS +36%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

76331 MIPS +29%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

73035 MIPS +23%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

70074 MIPS +18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

68500 MIPS +15%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

59347 MIPS Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (48124 - 64653, n=13)

57170 MIPS -4%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1

Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

6632 MIPS +10%Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=143, last 2 years)

6393 MIPS +6%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

6062 MIPS 0%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

6049 MIPS Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (5544 - 6371, n=13)

6011 MIPS -1%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5781 MIPS -4%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

5474 MIPS -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

5439 MIPS -10%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core

Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=143, last 2 years)

15561 Points +11%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

14031 Points 0%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

14025 Points Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

13714 Points -2%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13656 Points -3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

13323 Points -5%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

13088 Points -7%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10774 - 14194, n=14)

12979 Points -7%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2873 Points 0%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2863 Points Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=143, last 2 years)

2777 Points -3%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1874 - 2942, n=14)

2726 Points -5%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2694 Points -6%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

2570 Points -10%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2418 Points -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

2410 Points -16%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core

Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=142, last 2 years)

16675 Points +34%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

14120 Points +14%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

13936 Points +12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

13556 Points +9%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

12905 Points +4%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

12426 Points Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

11803 Points -5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (6705 - 12968, n=15)

11155 Points -10%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

2127 Points +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

2115 Points Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=142, last 2 years)

2000 Points -5%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1951 Points -8%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1902 Points -10%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (805 - 2155, n=15)

1855 Points -12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1775 Points -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1755 Points -17%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset

Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=143, last 2 years)

27 fps +20%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

26.3 fps +17%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

22.7 fps +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

22.5 fps Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

21.6 fps -4%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

20.8 fps -8%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (16.2 - 22.9, n=13)

20.3 fps -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

19.9 fps -12%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF

Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

68.1 s * -26%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (43.3 - 88.8, n=13)

56.8 s * -5%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

53.9 s * Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

49.6 s * +8%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

49.1 s * +9%Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=142, last 2 years)

47.7 s * +12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

44.8 s * +17%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

39.7 s * +26%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean

Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4828 sec * -18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4654 sec * -14%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

0.4457 sec * -9%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

0.4352 sec * -6%Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=144, last 2 years)

0.4286 sec * -5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.403 - 0.4934, n=13)

0.4194 sec * -3%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

0.409 sec * -0%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350

0.4089 sec * * ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2432 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit231 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit204 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6738 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)770 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core1966 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core17865 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core117.7 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core917 Points

Help... in comparisonCinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparisonAsus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min)

N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs91 ...Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M912Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Late 23) R7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU913Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M916Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop917Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070920Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M921Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M921 ...

(max)

TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation5372

Performance rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance rating

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

92.2 pt Average of class Gaming

87.5 pt Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

78.9 pt Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

73.8 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

70.7 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

68.2 pt Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

66 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

63.3 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

37537 KRay/s +36%Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=141, last 2 years)

28135 KRay/s +2%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

27731 KRay/s +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

27546 KRay/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (20203 - 28112, n=13)

24948 KRay/s -9%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

18446 KRay/s -33%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

17015 KRay/s -38%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

16431 KRay/s -40%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

145697 Points +36%Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=141, last 2 years)

126978 Points +19%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

118600 Points +11%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

106890 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (75098 - 108991, n=13)

95727 Points -10%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

95213 Points -11%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

88083 Points -18%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

85461 Points -20%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=141, last 2 years)

5835 MB/s +35%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

5824 MB/s +35%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

4920 MB/s +14%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

4322 MB/s Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

4278 MB/s -1%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

4134 MB/s -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3395 - 4399, n=13)

4018 MB/s -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

3814 MB/s -12%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=141, last 2 years)

119497 Points +55%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

105028 Points +37%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

94638 Points +23%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

94395 Points +23%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

90347 Points +17%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

89747 Points +17%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

76919 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=13)

74332 Points -3%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

18877 Points +39%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

15189 Points +11%Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=141, last 2 years)

14374 Points +6%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

13624 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (11916 - 13856, n=13)

13231 Points -3%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

11392 Points -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

10641 Points -22%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

10607 Points -22%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

77991 Points +35%Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=141, last 2 years)

65454 Points +14%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

63114 Points +10%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

57591 Points Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (39456 - 58771, n=12)

51987 Points -10%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

47315 Points -18%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

43496 Points -24%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

41806 Points -27%AIDA64 / CPU AES

Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=141, last 2 years)

109061 MB/s +29%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

94250 MB/s +11%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

88619 MB/s +4%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

84817 MB/s Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

84332 MB/s -1%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

81863 MB/s -3%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

79475 MB/s -6%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 87670, n=13)

76994 MB/s -9%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

1530 MB/s +34%Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=141, last 2 years)

1527 MB/s +34%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

1297 MB/s +14%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

1208 MB/s +6%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

1138 MB/s Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

1128 MB/s -1%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

1099 MB/s -3%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (839 - 1138, n=13)

1035 MB/s -9%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

20330 KRay/s +36%Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=141, last 2 years)

15059 KRay/s +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

14944 KRay/s Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

14776 KRay/s -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10707 - 15203, n=12)

13642 KRay/s -9%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

9768 KRay/s -35%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

8899 KRay/s -40%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

8449 KRay/s -43%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

53918 MPixel/s +23%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

52123 MPixel/s +19%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

49238 MPixel/s +12%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

43885 MPixel/s Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=141, last 2 years)

42790 MPixel/s -2%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47405, n=13)

41418 MPixel/s -6%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

39928 MPixel/s -9%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

36752 MPixel/s -16%

系统性能Aero X16 在系统基准测试中表现出色,在日常使用中也没有出现任何问题,所有应用程序都能毫无延迟地运行。

Performance rating: Percent PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total Performance rating

Average of class Gaming

90.5 pt Dell XPS 16 9640 -1! GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

89 pt Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

86.3 pt Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

85.7 pt Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

84.1 pt Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23) -1! GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

82 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

81.4 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

78.2 pt PCMark 10 / Score

Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

8183 Points +3%Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=120, last 2 years)

8063 Points +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

7925 Points Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

7836 Points -1%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (7717 - 7925, n=2)

7821 Points -1%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

7547 Points -5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

7123 Points -10%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

7084 Points -11%PCMark 10 / Essentials

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10510 - 11793, n=2)

11152 Points +6%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

11133 Points +6%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

10934 Points +4%Average of class Gaming (8840 - 12600, n=124, last 2 years)

10748 Points +2%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

10543 Points 0%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

10510 Points Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

10393 Points -1%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

10038 Points -4%PCMark 10 / Productivity

Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10416 - 10730, n=2)

10573 Points +2%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

10526 Points +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

10416 Points Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

10030 Points -4%Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=120, last 2 years)

9824 Points -6%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

9208 Points -12%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

9192 Points -12%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

9067 Points -13%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation

Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=120, last 2 years)

13642 Points +11%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

12920 Points +5%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

12351 Points 0%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

12337 Points Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

11554 Points -6%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (9858 - 12337, n=2)

11098 Points -10%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

10612 Points -14%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

10100 Points -18%CrossMark / Overall

Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=114, last 2 years)

1984 Points +13%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

1848 Points +5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1752 - 1858, n=2)

1805 Points +3%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1769 Points +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1752 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1721 Points -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

1719 Points -2%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

1694 Points -3%CrossMark / Productivity

Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=114, last 2 years)

1863 Points +12%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

1750 Points +5%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1664 - 1732, n=2)

1698 Points +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1664 Points Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

1629 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1624 Points -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

1611 Points -3%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1596 Points -4%CrossMark / Creativity

Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=114, last 2 years)

2215 Points +13%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2126 Points +9%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1959 - 2077, n=2)

2018 Points +3%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

2014 Points +3%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

1993 Points +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1959 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1942 Points -1%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

1862 Points -5%CrossMark / Responsiveness

Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=114, last 2 years)

1736 Points +19%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

1683 Points +15%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1461 - 1642, n=2)

1552 Points +6%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1461 Points Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

1435 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1424 Points -3%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1385 Points -5%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

1338 Points -8%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

336 Points Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=118, last 2 years)

315 Points -6%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (288 - 336, n=2)

312 Points -7%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

295 Points -12%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

288 Points -14%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

283 Points -16%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

283 Points -16%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

274 Points -18%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=114, last 2 years)

283 Points +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

277 Points Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

271 Points -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

268 Points -3%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (246 - 277, n=2)

262 Points -5%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

256 Points -8%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

254 Points -8%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

548 ms * -27%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

533 ms * -24%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

494 ms * -15%Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=128, last 2 years)

473 ms * -10%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (431 - 470, n=2)

451 ms * -5%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

431 ms * Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

430 ms * -0%* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score

7925 pointsHelp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

94254 MB/s +29%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

92745 MB/s +27%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

89914 MB/s +23%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

89414 MB/s +22%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 106997, n=13)

79675 MB/s +9%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

73142 MB/s Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=141, last 2 years)

70641 MB/s -3%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

67907 MB/s -7%AIDA64 / Memory Read

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

99410 MB/s +60%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

87768 MB/s +41%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

86576 MB/s +39%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

83887 MB/s +35%Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=141, last 2 years)

73517 MB/s +18%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

62290 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63650, n=13)

61697 MB/s -1%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

60730 MB/s -3%AIDA64 / Memory Write

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

106764 MB/s +24%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 110817, n=13)

94367 MB/s +10%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

86056 MB/s Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

84517 MB/s -2%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

75773 MB/s -12%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

73377 MB/s -15%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

73337 MB/s -15%Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=141, last 2 years)

72188 MB/s -16%AIDA64 / Memory Latency

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

140 ns * -44%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

136.6 ns * -41%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

129.6 ns * -33%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

114.6 ns * -18%Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=141, last 2 years)

101.5 ns * -4%Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 109.8, n=13)

100.3 ns * -3%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

97.2 ns * Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

87.9 ns * +10%* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的 Aero X16 在使用实时音频应用程序时表现出了局限性。

LatencyMon:概述

LatencyMon:驱动程序

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

2484.4 μs * -17%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2123.1 μs * Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1437.2 μs * +32%Dell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

903.7 μs * +57%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

673.1 μs * +68%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

464.1 μs * +78%* ... smaller is better

存储设备我们的 Aero X16 样品安装了金士顿的 1 TB SSD。PCIe 4.0 x4 固态硬盘的传输速率总体良好,即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持稳定。

不过,第二个固态硬盘插槽只能通过 PCIe 4.0 x2 连接,因此传输速率最高只能达到每秒 3.5 GB 左右。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

4808 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

3906 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

649 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

434 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

67.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

258 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:

2505 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:

1680 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0Sequential Read:

4042MB/s

Sequential Write:

3558MB/s

4K Read:

82.1MB/s

4K Write:

227MB/s

4K-64 Read:

2381MB/s

4K-64 Write:

2305MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.036ms

Access Time Write:

0.032ms

Copy ISO:

4426.09MB/s

Copy Program:

968.94MB/s

Copy Game:

1525.75MB/s

Score Read:

2867Points

Score Write:

2888Points

Score Total:

7205Points

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

4821MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

3915MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

2508MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

3905MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

2919MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

3730MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

66.5MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

255MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

4808MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance rating - Percent

Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

89.2 pt Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

80.1 pt Average of class Gaming

78.9 pt Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

71.9 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

67.1 pt Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

65.9 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

50.3 pt Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

38 pt DiskSpd

seq readDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

4156 (4146.28min - 4156.42max) MB/s +66%Average of class Gaming (281 - 8300, n=126, last 2 years)

3488 MB/s +39%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

3449 (3368.24min - 3448.79max) MB/s +38%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s +28%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

2757 (2720.02min - 2757.13max) MB/s +10%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (1243 - 3327, n=17)

2577 MB/s +3%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2508 (1821.45min - 2508max) MB/s Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2286 (2275.41min - 2285.85max) MB/s -9% seq writeDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

4833 (4624.01min - 4832.66max) MB/s +24%Average of class Gaming (1247 - 9699, n=126, last 2 years)

3979 MB/s +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

3905 (2240.1min - 3904.64max) MB/s Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

3637 (3591.53min - 3636.88max) MB/s -7%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

3474 (3404.52min - 3474.32max) MB/s -11%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (977 - 3913, n=17)

3415 MB/s -13%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -35%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2052 (2008.86min - 2051.64max) MB/s -47% seq q8 t1 readSchenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

7137 (6595.15min - 7137.45max) MB/s +48%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

6985 (6183.66min - 6984.69max) MB/s +45%Average of class Gaming (2644 - 15056, n=126, last 2 years)

6906 MB/s +43%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

6257 (5307.47min - 6256.78max) MB/s +30%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s +4%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

4821 (4294.34min - 4820.52max) MB/s Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (1754 - 4821, n=17)

4523 MB/s -6%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

4129 (3480.85min - 4128.87max) MB/s -14% seq q8 t1 writeSchenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

6818 (6604.35min - 6817.63max) MB/s +74%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

6040 (5907.05min - 6040.01max) MB/s +54%Average of class Gaming (1281 - 13519, n=126, last 2 years)

5558 MB/s +42%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

5426 (5242.67min - 5425.96max) MB/s +39%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

3915 (3898.36min - 3915.17max) MB/s Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (982 - 3927, n=17)

3624 MB/s -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -17%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2461 (2329.77min - 2461.01max) MB/s -37% 4k q1 t1 readAverage of class Gaming (32.2 - 110.2, n=126, last 2 years)

69.2 MB/s +4%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

67.3 (66.55min - 67.32max) MB/s +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

66.5 (65.03min - 66.52max) MB/s Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

64.2 (63.05min - 64.22max) MB/s -3%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

63.7 (63.29min - 63.65max) MB/s -4%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (37.7 - 81.1, n=17)

61 MB/s -8%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s -20%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

32.9 (32.39min - 32.88max) MB/s -51% 4k q1 t1 writeGigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

255 (218.03min - 254.91max) MB/s Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (67.6 - 435, n=17)

223 MB/s -13%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

214 (212.24min - 213.72max) MB/s -16%Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=126, last 2 years)

210 MB/s -18%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

146.3 (140.58min - 146.31max) MB/s -43%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

139.8 (135.84min - 139.76max) MB/s -45%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

134.1 (128.03min - 134.09max) MB/s -47%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s -50% 4k q32 t16 readDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

3811 (3808.17min - 3810.83max) MB/s +31%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2919 (2877.27min - 2918.5max) MB/s Average of class Gaming (417 - 8067, n=126, last 2 years)

2564 MB/s -12%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (434 - 2980, n=17)

1942 MB/s -33%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

1077 (1013.53min - 1077.14max) MB/s -63%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

859 (816.31min - 859.16max) MB/s -71%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -79%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

539 (525.18min - 538.76max) MB/s -82% 4k q32 t16 writeGigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

3730 (3655.4min - 3730.3max) MB/s Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

2682 (2675.9min - 2682.13max) MB/s -28%Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5653, n=126, last 2 years)

2145 MB/s -42%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (154.9 - 3784, n=17)

1812 MB/s -51%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

439 (405.1min - 438.82max) MB/s -88%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

413 (372.31min - 412.68max) MB/s -89%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -89%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

291 (277.75min - 290.51max) MB/s -92%AS SSD

Score TotalDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

8212 Points +14%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

7205 Points Average of class Gaming (2858 - 13854, n=124, last 2 years)

6884 Points -4%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

6198 Points -14%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (1166 - 8405, n=16)

5743 Points -20%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

5214 Points -28%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

3272 Points -55%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2912 Points -60% Score ReadDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

3310 Points +15%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2867 Points Average of class Gaming (953 - 4418, n=124, last 2 years)

2366 Points -17%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (571 - 2901, n=16)

1948 Points -32%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

1603 Points -44%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

1397 Points -51%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1020 Points -64%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

953 Points -67% Score WriteSchenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

3812 Points +32%Average of class Gaming (1375 - 7208, n=124, last 2 years)

3368 Points +17%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

3244 Points +12%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

3190 Points +10%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2888 Points Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (331 - 4040, n=16)

2830 Points -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1808 Points -37%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1546 Points -46% Seq ReadDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

5730 MB/s +42%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

5399 MB/s +34%Average of class Gaming (2272 - 9890, n=124, last 2 years)

5264 MB/s +30%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

4362 MB/s +8%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

4042 MB/s Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

3867 MB/s -4%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

3662 MB/s -9%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (1474 - 4193, n=16)

3581 MB/s -11% Seq WriteDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

5175 MB/s +45%Average of class Gaming (114.5 - 9926, n=124, last 2 years)

3931 MB/s +10%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

3558 MB/s Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

3376 MB/s -5%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

3314 MB/s -7%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (648 - 3688, n=16)

2694 MB/s -24%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

2113 MB/s -41%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1921 MB/s -46% 4K ReadGigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

82.1 MB/s Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (41.2 - 90.8, n=16)

71.3 MB/s -13%Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 108.4, n=124, last 2 years)

68.3 MB/s -17%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

64.2 MB/s -22%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

63.3 MB/s -23%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

61.2 MB/s -25%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

48.9 MB/s -40%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

42.2 MB/s -49% 4K WriteGigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

227 MB/s Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (82.5 - 275, n=16)

219 MB/s -4%Average of class Gaming (75.6 - 512, n=124, last 2 years)

218 MB/s -4%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

191.9 MB/s -15%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

185.9 MB/s -18%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

183.8 MB/s -19%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

181.9 MB/s -20%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

157.9 MB/s -30% 4K-64 ReadDell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

2673 MB/s +12%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2381 MB/s Average of class Gaming (517 - 3630, n=124, last 2 years)

1772 MB/s -26%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (382 - 2409, n=16)

1518 MB/s -36%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

1105 MB/s -54%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

793 MB/s -67%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

612 MB/s -74%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

517 MB/s -78% 4K-64 WriteSchenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

3293 MB/s +43%Average of class Gaming (991 - 5909, n=124, last 2 years)

2761 MB/s +20%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

2675 MB/s +16%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

2535 MB/s +10%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (183.4 - 3492, n=16)

2341 MB/s +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2305 MB/s Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

1458 MB/s -37%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

1148 MB/s -50% Access Time ReadAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.111 ms * -208%Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (0.036 - 0.127, n=16)

0.0775 ms * -115%Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=124, last 2 years)

0.05756 ms * -60%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

0.042 ms * -17%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

0.036 ms * Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

0.032 ms * +11%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

0.022 ms * +39%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

0.021 ms * +42% Access Time WriteAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVMicron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

0.099 ms * -209%Average of class Gaming (0.012 - 0.277, n=124, last 2 years)

0.04029 ms * -26%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

0.032 ms * Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 (0.02 - 0.06, n=16)

0.03144 ms * +2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MWD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

0.023 ms * +28%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

0.022 ms * +31%Dell XPS 16 9640Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

0.021 ms * +34%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N

0.02 ms * +37%* ... smaller is better

Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4808 (4354.63-4823.66)

图形处理器性能技嘉 Aero X16 基于新的 GeForce RTX 5070 笔记本电脑配备 85 W TGP 和普通 Optimus GPU 开关。正如我们在 我们的分析新款 5070 笔记本电脑并不比之前的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.8 GB 的 VRAM 也不是特别适合未来使用。

在合成和游戏基准测试中,RTX 5070 笔记本电脑与 TGP 值稍高的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的变体(最高达 100 W)不相上下,同时比 80 W 的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑变体高出几个百分点。

所提供的游戏性能原则上足以满足当前游戏的 QHD 分辨率,不过在某些画质设置下,VRAM 可能会造成限制。

GPU 性能在持续负载下保持稳定,但电池功耗降低到 35 W(-53%)。

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance rating - Percent

Average of class Gaming

100 pt Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

93.1 pt Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

90.9 pt Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

83.8 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

83.8 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

74.8 pt Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

73.6 pt Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

66.9 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Average of class Gaming (13523 - 80022, n=137, last 2 years)

48379 Points +20%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

45606 Points +13%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (36721 - 49568, n=18)

44407 Points +10%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

40646 Points +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

40285 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

37313 Points -7%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

36412 Points -10%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

33251 Points -17%3DMark

1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Gaming (6487 - 62849, n=151, last 2 years)

36024 Points +15%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (28759 - 38680, n=20)

35406 Points +13%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

32810 Points +5%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

31345 Points Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

30874 Points -2%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

27466 Points -12%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

26568 Points -15%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

24235 Points -23%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Gaming (2295 - 25984, n=148, last 2 years)

14924 Points +23%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (10851 - 14771, n=20)

13331 Points +10%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

13040 Points +8%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

12181 Points +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

12119 Points Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

10989 Points -9%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

10358 Points -15%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

9638 Points -20%

3DMark 11 Performance

32789 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

27569 points3DMark Time Spy Score

11868 points3DMark Steel Nomad Score

2587 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score

11847 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score

12062 pointsHelp... in comparison3DMark 11 in comparisonHP Stream 7 5700ng (min)

Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)183 ...Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop32681Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, GeForce RTX 406032694Schenker VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU32729Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop32789Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU32806Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU32824MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU32875 ...

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max)

R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 509082642

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

22 Seconds * -6%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

21 Seconds * -1%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

21 Seconds * -1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

20.8 Seconds * Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

20 Seconds * +4%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (17 - 24, n=18)

19.7 Seconds * +5%Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=140, last 2 years)

19.3 Seconds * +7%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

19 Seconds * +9%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

43 Seconds * -23%Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

36 Seconds * -3%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

35 Seconds * Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

34 Seconds * +3%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (29 - 36, n=18)

32.3 Seconds * +8%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

32 Seconds * +9%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

32 Seconds * +9%Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=141, last 2 years)

32 Seconds * +9%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

330 Seconds * -2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

323 Seconds * Dell XPS 16 9640NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

306 Seconds * +5%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

298 Seconds * +8%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

285 Seconds * +12%Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=140, last 2 years)

261 Seconds * +19%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (137 - 372, n=16)

250 Seconds * +23%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

214 Seconds * +34%* ... smaller is better

Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance rating - Percent

Average of class Gaming

100 pt Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23) -2! AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

87.8 pt Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

86.3 pt Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

85.3 pt Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

77.8 pt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M -1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

72.5 pt Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

70.1 pt Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=141, last 2 years)

101.1 fps +12%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

90.1 (73.4min) fps Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

76.9 (18min) fps -15%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

75.6 (62.9min) fps -16%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

69 fps -23%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

64.3 (53.3min) fps -29%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T

Average of class Gaming (37.2 - 246, n=107, last 2 years)

134.8 fps +23%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

117.7 fps +8%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

109.4 fps Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

99 fps -10%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

91.8 fps -16%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x

Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years)

124.3 fps +11%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

116.1 (4.31min, 83.3P1) fps +4%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

114 (4.02min, 71.4P1) fps +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

111.8 (3.87min, 83.3P1) fps Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

110.9 (3.51min, 71.4P1) fps -1%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

103.6 (5.17min, 71.4P1) fps -7%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -12%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality

Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=141, last 2 years)

135.9 fps +14%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

124.8 fps +4%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

119.5 fps Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

115.7 fps -3%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

102.5 fps -14%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

100.8 fps -16%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

93.1 fps -22%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16

Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=129, last 2 years)

260 fps +11%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

234 (141.3min, 180P1) fps Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

218 (57.2min, 162.5P1) fps -7%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

213 fps -9%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

191.9 (103.2min, 137.2P1) fps -18%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

175 fps -25%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps -45%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking

Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=144, last 2 years)

154.2 fps +17%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

139 (119.7min) fps +5%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

136.2 (117.8min) fps +3%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

134.8 (119.8min) fps +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

131.9 (113.9min) fps Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

131.6 (114.5min) fps 0%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

89.7 (83.8min) fps -32%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)

Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=147, last 2 years)

103.7 fps +24%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

90.5 fps +8%Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

85.5 fps +2%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

84.7 fps +1%Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

84.4 fps +1%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop

83.7 fps Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

81.2 fps -3%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

69.9 fps -16%

Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Ultra FPS chart

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø89.7 (80.8-91.1)

赛博朋克 2077》在 1080p 超高清下的 CPU 和 GPU 数据

lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4KGTA V (2015)

111.8

105.7

The Witcher 3 (2015)

104.7

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

158

129.5

141.6

131.9

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

210

149.9

119.5

85.8

49.1

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

104.3

100.7

83.7

Strange Brigade (2018)

511

331

270

234

164.2

90.3

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

109.4

75.8

65.1

41.1

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

90.1

58.3

26.4

Alan Wake 2 (2023)

64.6

41.5

18.6

F1 24 (2024)

77.7

76.1

48.7

18.9

15.5

Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024)

95

73

68

39

38

Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)

40

39

30

24

18

排放与能源:无压力时可承受的热量和噪音输出噪音排放技嘉 Aero X16:散热装置Aero X16 的双风扇在日常使用中通常处于关闭状态,只有在玩游戏或负载很高时才会真正打开。

不过,在性能模式下,双风扇的声压级(SPL)会达到 50 dB(A)左右,非常响亮。

在平衡模式下,我们录得的最大声压级为 46.8 dB(A),在环保模式下为 35.4 dB(A)。测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。

Noise level

Idle

23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)Load

33.2 / 50.2 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVGeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115NDell XPS 16 9640GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TBNoise7%-11%-7%-6%-5%off / environment * (dB)23.923 4%24.3 -2%24.5 -3%23.9 -0%23 4%Idle Minimum * (dB)23.923 4%24.3 -2%24.5 -3%23.9 -0%23 4%Idle Average * (dB)23.923 4%24.3 -2%24.5 -3%27.8 -16%28.48 -19%Idle Maximum * (dB)23.929.11 -22%25.8 -8%27.5 -15%30.1 -26%28.48 -19%Load Average * (dB)33.231 7%48.1 -45%39.6 -19%34.2 -3%30 10%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)50.236.23 28%Load Maximum * (dB)50.239.44 21%53.9 -7%49.7 1%46.4 8%54.12 -8%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)49.749.746.454.12* ... smaller is better

温度在执行基本任务时,机箱仍能保持凉爽,但在压力下,我们测得底部后部区域的温度接近 50 °C。因此,在高负载情况下,不应将 Aero X16 放在大腿上。

不过,底座顶部的温度相对较低,在运行重负载时打字不会受到任何限制。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中,RTX 5070 笔记本显卡的运行功耗为 70 W,而 Ryzen AI 7 350 的功耗则被限制在 25 W。

Prime95 和 FurMark 压力测试期间的 CPU/GPU 数据

Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

40.6 °C41.5 °C43.3 °C 35.5 °C39.7 °C38.4 °C 32.4 °C30.3 °C32.1 °C

Maximum: 43.3 °CAverage: 37.1 °C

48.3 °C50.3 °C49.1 °C43.5 °C45.4 °C37.4 °C29.3 °C30.7 °C30.1 °C

Maximum: 50.3 °CAverage: 40.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

26.9 °C27 °C27 °C 26.8 °C26.9 °C26.8 °C 26.5 °C25.9 °C25.9 °C

Maximum: 27 °CAverage: 26.6 °C

27.9 °C28.3 °C28.2 °C27.2 °C27.8 °C27.7 °C26.7 °C26.8 °C26.7 °C

Maximum: 28.3 °CAverage: 27.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 26.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

40.2 °C40.1 °C41.7 °C 35.7 °C38.9 °C37 °C 32.5 °C30.6 °C31.6 °C

Maximum: 41.7 °CAverage: 36.5 °C

47.3 °C49.6 °C49.2 °C44.9 °C45.1 °C36.8 °C29.6 °C30.3 °C29.8 °C

Maximum: 49.6 °CAverage: 40.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 43.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.3 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).

应力测试期间的表面温度(顶部)

应力测试期间的表面温度(底部)

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 LaptopAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPULenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUDell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUSchenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPUHeat7%5%9%-6%-7%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)43.338 12%41.7 4%39.4 9%50.3 -16%46 -6%Maximum Bottom * (°C)50.337 26%46.3 8%36.9 27%48 5%44 13%Idle Upper Side * (°C)2728 -4%26.2 3%28.2 -4%28.8 -7%32 -19%Idle Bottom * (°C)28.330 -6%27.2 4%27.4 3%29.8 -5%33 -17%* ... smaller is better

发言人两个立体声扬声器(2x 2 瓦)声音清晰,给人留下深刻印象,但整体功率不大。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 59% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WV audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.84 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 30% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 16 9640 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)Compared to same class» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23) audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源消耗150 瓦供电装置Aero X16 是一款比较经济的设备,空闲模式下的功耗为 11 W。我们的测量结果显示,在压力测试中的最大功耗为 155 W,随后迅速降至 127 W。

在玩游戏时,笔记本电脑的功耗约为 120 W,因此所提供的 150 W 紧凑型电源装置可以保证笔记本电脑有足够的电力供应。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.25 / 1.2 WattIdle 5.8 / 10.9 / 11.2 Watt

Load

91.3 / 155.3 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHRyzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVRyzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"Dell XPS 16 9640Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3"Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MUltra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)R7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"Power Consumption-18%-59%1%-12%-44%Idle Minimum * (Watt)5.86.8 -17%10.3 -78%7.7 -33%8.3 -43%11 -90%Idle Average * (Watt)10.912.7 -17%21.9 -101%10.3 6%12.5 -15%15.2 -39%Idle Maximum * (Watt)11.215.2 -36%22.4 -100%10.6 5%12.8 -14%16 -43%Load Average * (Watt)91.385 7%96.9 -6%76.5 16%71.3 22%64 30%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)117.9143 -21%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)123.8145 -17%Load Maximum * (Watt)155.3199 -28%173.8 -12%138.5 11%169.1 -9%280 -80%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)159.6126.4127.5179* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø130.6 (106.5-155.3) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.5 (6.51-12.9) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø123.8 (117.5-128.3)

Power consumption: External monitor

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø106.6 (98.5-125.8) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø115.7 (108-122.9) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø58.6 (44-119.9) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø111.9 (108-126.4) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø115.3 (105.6-128.1) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.6 (5.56-37.4) Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø117.9 (112.9-123.2)

电池寿命对于一款 16 英寸设备来说,76 Whr 的电池容量相对较小,因此电池续航时间也只能算一般。我们的标准 WLAN 测试在亮度为 150 cd/m² 时可使用 8.5 小时,而在全亮度时仅可使用不到 6.5 小时。

在设备打开的情况下,充满电需要 94 分钟,45 分钟后可充满 80%的电量。

电池信息

充电过程

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

8h 35min

WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness

6h 28min

Battery Runtime

WiFi WebsurfingAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVRyzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh

14.2 h +65%Dell XPS 16 9640Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh

10.5 h +22%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh

8.8 h +2%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHRyzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh

8.6 h Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)R7 7840HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh

8.4 h -2%Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MUltra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh

7.3 h -15%Average of class Gaming (1.417 - 14.8, n=125, last 2 years)

6.58 h -23% WiFi Websurfing max. BrightnessDell XPS 16 9640Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh

8.2 h +26%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHRyzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh

6.5 h Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MUltra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh

5.8 h -11%Average of class Gaming (2.35 - 8.93, n=36, last 2 years)

5.17 h -20%Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Ultra 9 185H, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh

4.5 h -31%

Notebookcheck 总体评分技嘉 Aero X16 是一款性能全面的中端游戏笔记本电脑,规格相当不错,但配备 8 GB VRAM 的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑 GPU 在 QHD 最大设置下很快就会成为现代 AAA 游戏的限制因素。

Back to the verdict

Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH

- 05/21/2025 v8

Andreas Osthoff

Chassis86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard89%

Pointing Device88%

Connectivity56 / 80 → 70%

Weight63 / 10-68 → 92%

Battery80 / 95 → 85%

Display86%

Games Performance87%

Application Performance87%

Temperature87 / 95 → 91%

Noise78 / 90 → 87%

Audio71%

Camera31 / 75 → 41%

Average59%

84%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use79.1%Repairability40%Software Updates0.67% Total Sustainability Score: 28.3%

Potential competitors in comparison

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightHeightDisplay

1.83.7%Gigabyte Aero X16 1WHAMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $1,599.99GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ ...2. $1,149.99GIGABYTE AERO X16; Copilot+ ...3. Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto...List Price: 1799€2 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS

2.83%Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608WVAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: $1,199.99List Price: 1399 Euro2.2 kg25.7 mm16.00"1920x1200142 PPIIPS

3.88.7% v7 (old)Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $49.91Original New for Lenovo Yoga...2. $11.99KEANBOLL (3 Pack) Designed f...3. $7.90Keyboard Cover for 2025 2024...List Price: 2700€2.1 kg18.3 mm16.00"3200x2000236 PPIMini-LED

4.88.6% v7 (old)Dell XPS 16 9640Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: 1. $2,959.00Dell XPS 16 9640 16.3" Touch...2. $2,799.00【Halloween Limited】New X...3. $2,899.00NewDell XPS 16 9640 Business...2.3 kg18.7 mm16.30"3840x2400139 PPIOLED

5.92.3% v7 (old)Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MIntel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDAmazon: $1,472.18List Price: 3000€1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIOLED

6.89.2% v7 (old)Schenker XMG CORE 16 (L23)AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSDList Price: 2230 Euro2.4 kg26.1 mm16.00"2560x1600189 PPIIPS

More articles related to this deviceGigabyte Aero X16 1WH (Aero X16 Series)

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 645216 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!